If the TCSS rules engine is compromised, can an attacker disguise an external transaction as an internal one to steal assets?

No. An attacker cannot disguise an external transaction as an internal one to bypass security boundaries, even if the cloud-hosted TCSS is completely compromised and forced to approve every incoming request.

This attack vector fails because no wallet policy can ever be satisfied by an automated TCSS signature alone. A policy must always require a separate, independent human signer or a secure customer-managed API key to execute a transfer.

Was this article helpful?
0 out of 0 found this helpful